legOS : 3105


Robotics / RCX / legOS / 3105	3104 \| 3106

Subject:	*Re: DISTRIBUTED/PARALLEL CLUSTER for legOS through nRCX**
Newsgroups:	lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:48:57 GMT
Viewed:	3458 times

CarlosLuis Rendón M. wrote: > Yes Kekoa it's a bottle neck, as I wrote on the original message, the main > idea is to distribute the load, with the MINIMUM amount of network > traffic. I think that all the RCX should be connected through fibre > optics, in order to implement the comunication. I think that the idea of > Mark, is suitable, to implement a master/slave model. An interesting idea. Presumably a light sensor alone would suffice, as it could be switched between active/passive mode to turn the LED on/off. You couldn't get high bandwidth, but there wouldn't be interference. Also, this would take multiple sensor inputs. -- "I love deadlines. I especially love the whooshing sound they make as they go by." Nick Tarleton - nickptar@mindspring.com - PGP Key ID: 0x6B9A9D44

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: DISTRIBUTED/PARALLEL CLUSTER for legOS through n*RCX
Nick, What you propose it's another way, and of course, should work, but we might have to create another software layer over the current operating system of the RCX (of course, legOS), and we would loose 1 sensor per RCX. What I was trying to (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: DISTRIBUTED/PARALLEL CLUSTER for legOS through n*RCX
Yes Kekoa it's a bottle neck, as I wrote on the original message, the main idea is to distribute the load, with the MINIMUM amount of network traffic. I think that all the RCX should be connected through fibre optics, in order to implement the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

7 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search