To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 3099
3098  |  3100
Subject: 
Re: DISTRIBUTED/PARALLEL CLUSTER for legOS through n*RCX
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:51:16 GMT
Viewed: 
6354 times
  
Hi there, did some worh with rcx/legos/DSM in my thesis which can be found
at www.cs.uit.no/~kennethj/Thesis.ps Although i didnt share the memory of
each rcx, i installed a dsm server(created at the local university)
on a notebook which each rcx could
read/write to, as well as contact another rcx directly if desired.
anyways, take a look at the thesis, perhaps you will get some idea of what
to do...(or not to do:)
kenneth


On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, CarlosLuis Rendón M. wrote:

> Hi all. I'm taking a course on parallel/distributed operating systems. So
> this post attempts to find out if someone has thought, or has implemented
> some kind of distributed application over BrickOS/legOS (from now legOS, for
> this post). I know there's support for IP/IR networking. But what I'd like
> to do is to have an extra layer, that hides to the end user (the
> programmer), the managment of the n*RCX, that conform this "cluster". This
> would mean that to the programmer, this megaRCX would have 3*n
> sensors/motors (where n is the # of RCXs that would conform the "cluster").
> Of course every RCX attached to the cluster should process/take decisions
> over his sensors/motors, and then just inform status to the main scheduler
> (is just an idea of how to implement it, I'm not an expert on this).
> Also, would be great to share the memory (which is so scarce on a single
> RCX). In a nutshell: to have MPMD (multiple process over multiple data),
> over this megaRCX. I know that there's a big problem with the speed (the IR
> port), but for now, we don't want this "cluster" for a hard real time app,
> do we? So, would be great to recieve comments about what's been done until
> now, feasibility (is out of the planet to put this extra layer over what's
> done until now of  legOS?), pros/con, and of course, any kind of comment.
> 
> PD: also would be great if Markus (or any of his lieutenants), could give me
> some light on any of the aspects I've mentioned above.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> CarlosLuis Rendon M.
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  DISTRIBUTED/PARALLEL CLUSTER for legOS through n*RCX
 
Hi all. I'm taking a course on parallel/distributed operating systems. So this post attempts to find out if someone has thought, or has implemented some kind of distributed application over BrickOS/legOS (from now legOS, for this post). I know (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR