To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 3104
3103  |  3105
Subject: 
Re: brickOS with BricxCC
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:50:19 GMT
Viewed: 
6953 times
  
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, John Hansen writes:
> So far I have heard from two people who have successfully used brickOS with
> BricxCC.

Well, I guess I am one of the two :) Its nice to know I am on the cutting
edge of things. Actually I am probably one of the few BrickOS users that is
too dumb or impatient to deal with cygwin or unix.

> Currently BricxCC requires that the cygwin bin directory (normally
> c:\cygwin\bin) be on the environment PATH.  Is that a problem for potential
> users?  It seems okay to me, but I'm interested in your opinions.

Seems fine to me. I think all we need is a well laid out set of instructions
for installing BrickOS and getting it to work with BrickCC. I did it by
scouring the information from this newsgroup, but it was kind of scattered.

> Compiler warnings throw BricxCC for a loop at the moment.  It handles GNU
> compiler errors fairly well.  NQC and the LASM compiler do not output
> warnings.  I've toyed with adding CFLAGS += -w to the makefile template in
> BricxCC to turn off compiler warnings.  Obviously, the best solution would
> be to handle whatever the compiler spits out in an intelligent manner.  Turn
> off warnings or spend the time to make BricxCC handle warnings correctly,
> what do you think?

I find the compiler warnings to be very helpful. They often tell me exactly
what my dumb mistake was.

> Has anyone tried the Project Manager (multi-file compilation) feature yet?
> I'd like to know if it meets the needs of users out there who have
> multi-file brickOS programs.

Nope. I'm not even sure how it works. Is that like writing your own header
files or something?

> I'd like to hear from BricxCC users what they think of code completion
> (Ctrl+Space) and parameter completion (Shift+Ctrl+Space) support as well as
> the new Procedure List (Shift+Ctrl+G).

I have seen it, but haven't tried it yet.

> Thanks in advance for your comments!

Well, I will say it again that I think BricxCC is an amazing program. I
loved using it with NQC, and now it makes BrickOS much less painful to use
:) You have done a great job at maintaining the program and continually
adding new features. I guess when BricxCC gets more tightly integated with
BrickOS, then all that would be required is documentation in the help file.
I suppose this is no small task though :(

Rob



Message is in Reply To:
  brickOS with BricxCC
 
So far I have heard from two people who have successfully used brickOS with BricxCC. I'm interested in whether anyone else has tried using BricxCC to edit/compile/download programs to brickOS. Currently BricxCC requires that the cygwin bin directory (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR