| | Re: BrickOS 0.2.6.09
|
|
Can someone tell me what part of the XFree86 stuff has the makedepend? I decided to upgrade to the latest version of BrickOS, and I'm having the same problem. Thanks Steve ----- Original Message ----- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:15:00 GMT To: (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: C Compiler for Windows 98
|
|
(...) Your compiler isn't the problem. The .o file is being generated by the compiler. Either the makefile is bad or makelx is barfing. Sorry if I can't help more, since I use Linux. Use cygwin - I think it's www.cygwin.com. (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: C Compiler for Windows 98
|
|
I don't know if this will help you at all, but, I found that C progams need all the variables declared at the beggining of the program, and this became quite annoying because of my experence with C++. So I asked someone who might know... In BrickOS (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | C Compiler for Windows 98
|
|
I have been using NQC for some time now and would like to move up to C++ programing with LegOS or BrickOS. I have spent many hours following the instructions on (URL) success in getting a working system. I have decided to try WinLegOS as suggested (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Installing BrickOS 0.2.6.09.newConf2
|
|
(...) Its a bug, fixed in the cvs version of brickOS, I believe. For now, adding: CFLAGS+=-D_WIN32 to the top of Makefile.common might work. I can't test it, because I don't have the h8300 compiler set up at the moment. -- Max. (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Installing BrickOS 0.2.6.09.newConf2
|
|
Hi, I tried to install brickos 0.2.6.09.newConf2 using the (URL) tutorial, everything goes kind of smoothly untill i have to type make strip in /brickos-0.2.6.09.newConf2/util cygwin responds with: $ make strip strip fontdesign.exe strip: (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: LNP-problem...
|
|
(...) Hi, I'm Pieter and working with Tom on a project. I 've tried you're code but it doesn't work. To me the problem seems to be with lnpd. Here is it's log of the session. 0:Info > created lock file /var/lock/LCK..ttyS0 233:Info > running in (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Why...
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (...) The OS should not impose conditions on the programmer. Just put in the docs "numbers less than 5ms (the default) are not recommended" or something to that effect. (...) My code isn't a task. It's (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: LNP-problem...
|
|
That looks ok to me. But I'm no expert on LNP. Here's a clip I use. It looks a lot like what you're using. It seems there may be a problem with your receive code. I'm REAL shaky on that. What does fputs do? ---- char *s; s = "101"; if (strlen(s)>0) (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: LNP-problem...
|
|
(...) ok this is the (relevant) code running on the rcx: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { char *p; init(); execi(&PacketWatcher, 0, NULL, PRIO_NORMAL, DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE); execi(&Messenger, 0, NULL, PRIO_LOWEST, DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE); return 0; } (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|