| |
I am running Windows XP. Should I also use the version of binutils that
the install steps recommend? I was reading the post about newer version of
binutils and was wondering if there are any advantages to using the newer
releases. If there are advantages, wouldnt using a newer version of gcc
also be a good idea?
thanks,
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Manlove" <emanlove@ieee.org>
To: <lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos@lugnet.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: gcc
> Sam
>
> Paolo Masetti instructions,
> http://legos.sourceforge.net/cygwin/INSTALL-cygwin.html, suggest • downloading
> gcc-2.95.2 for building the cross compiler. These instructions are • standard
> instructions for windows os. By the way which Windows OS(s) are you • running
> on (or plan to)?
>
> Ed
>
> Samuel Winchenbach <swinchen@eece.maine.edu> wrote in message
> news:001f01c254e5$c3952290$c3ff6f82@mrmosfet...
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I just installed the latest version of cygwin, and downloaded binutils • 2.12.
> I am wondering what version of gcc I should download, thanks.
>
> Sam
>
>
> --
> MIME ATTACHMENTS DISCARDED:
>
> 1. Content-Type: text/html;
> charset=so-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Length: 742
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: gcc
|
| Sam Paolo Masetti instructions, (URL) suggest downloading gcc-2.95.2 for building the cross compiler. These instructions are standard instructions for windows os. By the way which Windows OS(s) are you running on (or plan to)? Ed Samuel Winchenbach (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
