Subject:
|
Re: Using legos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net VS posting at lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:00:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1730 times
|
| |
|
|
"Ed Manlove" <emanlove@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:Gtw4Gt.421@lugnet.com...
> As mentioned in the RLS doc (http://legos.sourceforge.net/rlswork/) there • is
> mention of communicating with the sourceforge maillist
> legos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net. I don't think this is the greatest • idea
> for a couple of reasons. One it is tough to get signed on. Luis (for
> whatever reasons and I am not puting blame on him) is slow to add people • to
> the list. As far as I can tell I have not been added. Second is that • this
> exludes everyone who is not on the list. For an open source project this
> doesn't sound like a good idea. It limits good input.
I understand and agree with you here. However, I was able to sign up for
the maillist with no problems. It appeared to be automated (I received the
"confirm email address" email within minutes, replied and was added the next
day)
> But I do belive for the sack of project management and fluidity some
> discussion should be limited to certain discusssion circles. How this • takes
> place is not a much of a concern as is how WELL it takes place and that is
> is not excluding good input.
One possible solution would be to add a newsgroup for
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos.devel (or development). I like this solution
simply because a lot of people are here reading ...rcx.legos fairly often
anyway.
sourceforge has some good tools, but for threaded conversation, lugnet is
better IMO.
Joe
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
