Subject:
|
Re: reliability of quad speed LNP
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 23:06:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2242 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Mark Falco writes:
> So with inverting every other message byte were you able to work at 4x? Were
> you then also able to work at close range at 4x? It would seem easy to patch
> LNP to automatically do this inversion. I'll have to give this a try.
Probably depends on the make-up of the data you're transferring.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: reliability of quad speed LNP
|
| So with inverting every other message byte were you able to work at 4x? Were you then also able to work at close range at 4x? It would seem easy to patch LNP to automatically do this inversion. I'll have to give this a try. thanks, mark (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
