 | | Re: tweaking around dlcd_show( )
|
|
Hi, I haven't used LegOs (yet), but looking at the dlcd_show function, it expects 2 parameters. The defines are also for 2 parameters, so you would need to define and use it like this: int progressPattern[PATT...S_NB][2]={ {LCD_4_BOTL} , (...) (23 years ago, 25-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: tweaking around dlcd_show( )
|
|
Thanks Martin, I tried this too but it doesn't work : progress.c:27: macro `dlcd_show' used with too many (2) args progress.c:27: macro `BIT_OF' used with just one arg progress.c:27: macro `BYTE_OF' used with just one arg The hint seems to fit two (...) (23 years ago, 25-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: tweaking around dlcd_show( )
|
|
(...) Ooops! I obviously wasn't looking at it properly last night (only browsing through the zip file). As 'dlcd_show' is defined as a macro that takes one parameter, but uses it twice to each of BIT_OF and BYTE_OF, which in turn both take 2 (...) (23 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: tweaking around dlcd_show( )
|
|
(...) Nope - bit_set(0xef46,0x4) will work, but not dlcd_show(0xef46,0x4), as it needs only 1 parameter. (...) Choosing the types of the struct elements is the problem - these are passed to the h8's bset instruction. First, I tried void* & char, but (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: tweaking around dlcd_show( )
|
|
(...) Since writing this, I have set up a LegOs build environment, so had a play with it. It doesn't seem very useful the way it is written. See my bit about it below. (...) I had a bit of a go doing this as well, and since I didn't know what the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: tweaking around dlcd_show( )
|
|
(...) LCD_4_BOTL (...) I agree it's a bit bodgy. The one advantage is you only need to pass a single #define when calling it directly (OK not a huge advantage, but if you look at the values in the #defines, you'll see why it was done that way). But (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
