 | | multiple "execi" with different priorities —Thanasis Kostakos
|
| | | Hi, I am trying to run three different tasks, with the "execi" command. When all of the have the same priority=10, everything works ok. When I change the priority in one of them priority=11 or 12, then everything seems to go much slower, and (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: multiple "execi" with different priorities —Bernardo Dal Seno
|
| | | | | (...) That line seems ok to me. Setting priority for a task above 10 (normal priority) may cause starvation to other tasks. This depend on what your function process() does. If it never waits (using calls like wait_event(), sleep(), sem_wait()...) (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: multiple "execi" with different priorities —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) of (...) The call looks fine, but as Bernado said, you have to make sure that higher priority tasks relinquish control regularly. IIRC all tasks of a given priority must get a slice before any lower priority tasks get any slice. And remember (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: multiple "execi" with different priorities —Bernardo Dal Seno
|
| | | | (...) Actually legOS multitasking is preemptive :-) bye Bernardo (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: multiple "execi" with different priorities —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) have (...) Yes, I actually went & checked after I'd posted. Maybe I should've checked before 8?) Anyway, Stig Nielsson emailed me the following, which explains it a lot better, and will probably be useful for Thanasis to work out the original (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
