Subject:
|
Re: LegOS 0.2.5 and LNP
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 14:50:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1433 times
|
| |
|
|
> I cleaned up my code (found one bug!), the patch follows. As • you may see
> now there are two semaphore, because two are the resources to • give access
> to: the LNP buffer and the IR port. I modified the calling of • the handlers
> to avoid race condition in a multithead envinronment on a PC. • My only
> worry is the symbol the semaphore-related code in lnp.c should • depend on.
> I used the conditional
>
> #if defined CONF_TM || defined CONF_HOST
>
> Perhaps that breaks something in the utilities and we should • introduce a
> new symbol (CONF_HOST_TM?), I don't know for sure. I leave • this point to
> more savvy people.
I think that we can use safely (CONF_TM || defined CONF_HOST)
condition.
I'm checking the whole patch and I think that it could be
realeased soon.
I'm just wondering:
1) Why have you used
+ lnp_integrity_handler_t intgh;
+ lnp_addressing_handler_t addrh;
in lnp_receive_packet(), apart from a very little optimization or
something I can't see? :-)
2) I can see that you do not have any sem_destroy() for buf_sem,
so I will probably introduce a lnp_shutdown() function that will
to destroy it. That function wasn't required before buf_sem
introduction.
Any feedback?
Bye,
Paolo.
---
Bombs don't kill people, explosions do.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LegOS 0.2.5 and LNP
|
| (...) Ok. Checking and testing never hurts :-). (...) It's not for performance, but for correctness. The old code was like this: if(lnp_addressing_ha...ler[port]) { ... lnp_addressing_handl...th-2,src); You first test lnp_integrity_handler and then, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LegOS 0.2.5 and LNP
|
| (...) I cleaned up my code (found one bug!), the patch follows. As you may see now there are two semaphore, because two are the resources to give access to: the LNP buffer and the IR port. I modified the calling of the handlers to avoid race (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
