To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 1252
1251  |  1253
Subject: 
Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:16:01 GMT
Viewed: 
4997 times
  
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Paolo Masetti wrote:
> "Eddie C. Dost" <ecd@skynet.be> wrote in message
> news:200007222049.WAA21955@reset.reset.net...
> > With this approach, makelx has full section, symbol and relocation info
> > in the .r file, and can do a much better job moving sections around (in
> > case ld introduces extra alignment and such).
> > Also you get the chance to disassemble the binary, look at the relocs or
> > symbols with h8300-hitachi-hms-objdump, a lot better then when looking
> > at srecs with objdump.
> > If you need the srecs for anything, you can always use
> > ld -oformat symbolsrec to relocate the image and generate srecs.
> > 
> > If noone objects, I would implement this. The Makefile changes are • trivial,
> > only major change is to makelx, which would read coff files. I have done
> > these things before, so this would not be too hard.
> 
> In my opinion this is a great idea! :-) Please do the implementation!
> 
> It also could be very usefull to have some docs / makefile options to make
> srecs too.

Paolo and others:
Eddie and I have talked about this, and we both agree that this is a big
change- so I think we are aiming for this for 0.2.5. Since it has already
been seven months since 0.2.3, I think we'll aim for getting 0.2.4 out the
door as soon as we can, and then we all have some really good ideas for
0.2.5- Eddie's work would be the first step.
Luis

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Summertime... and the living is easy...
    fish are jumping and the cotton is high...
    So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry."
-Ella

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Message has 1 Reply:
  Ideas for 0.2.5 (was: Re: Possible bug with bss allocation)
 
(...) Shure, no problem. (...) While we are at it, I have two other major changes in mind: - Implement timers. A timer would install a callback function with a private to the caller void * argument. This callback function is called at the timers (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
 
"Eddie C. Dost" <ecd@skynet.be> wrote in message news:200007222049.WA...set.net... (...) trivial, (...) In my opinion this is a great idea! :-) Please do the implementation! It also could be very usefull to have some docs / makefile options to make (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR