To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 1252
1251  |  1253
Subject: 
Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:16:01 GMT
Viewed: 
2244 times
  
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Paolo Masetti wrote:
"Eddie C. Dost" <ecd@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:200007222049.WAA21955@reset.reset.net...
With this approach, makelx has full section, symbol and relocation info
in the .r file, and can do a much better job moving sections around (in
case ld introduces extra alignment and such).
Also you get the chance to disassemble the binary, look at the relocs or
symbols with h8300-hitachi-hms-objdump, a lot better then when looking
at srecs with objdump.
If you need the srecs for anything, you can always use
ld -oformat symbolsrec to relocate the image and generate srecs.

If noone objects, I would implement this. The Makefile changes are • trivial,
only major change is to makelx, which would read coff files. I have done
these things before, so this would not be too hard.

In my opinion this is a great idea! :-) Please do the implementation!

It also could be very usefull to have some docs / makefile options to make
srecs too.

Paolo and others:
Eddie and I have talked about this, and we both agree that this is a big
change- so I think we are aiming for this for 0.2.5. Since it has already
been seven months since 0.2.3, I think we'll aim for getting 0.2.4 out the
door as soon as we can, and then we all have some really good ideas for
0.2.5- Eddie's work would be the first step.
Luis

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Summertime... and the living is easy...
    fish are jumping and the cotton is high...
    So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry."
-Ella

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Message has 1 Reply:
  Ideas for 0.2.5 (was: Re: Possible bug with bss allocation)
 
(...) Shure, no problem. (...) While we are at it, I have two other major changes in mind: - Implement timers. A timer would install a callback function with a private to the caller void * argument. This callback function is called at the timers (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Possible bug with bss allocation
 
"Eddie C. Dost" <ecd@skynet.be> wrote in message news:200007222049.WA...set.net... (...) trivial, (...) In my opinion this is a great idea! :-) Please do the implementation! It also could be very usefull to have some docs / makefile options to make (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR