 | | Build on Win2K
|
|
Hi, I'm trying to get a legOS build environment set up on my PC, running under Windows 2000 professional. I've downloaded LegOS-0.2.3.tar.gz I'm using Peter Van der Beken's directions from //arthurdent.dorm.du...egOS-0.2.2 All seems to go well until (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Build on NT?
|
|
You can download the WinlegOS package for development on an NT. You will need a special utility program to fix a problem with long filename support (a bug in WinNT). legOS for Windows (5.5megs): (URL) Long filename support: (URL) you wish to rebuild (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Build on NT?
|
|
Is anybody successfully building legOS on NT? If so we need to talk... please email offline. Thanks Tom (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Another possible makefile change
|
|
(...) great, Rossz, but i see one little problem here. I'm suspecting that it's no good idea to include Makefile.common in the Makefile for dll-src, because Makefile.common sets some standard Variables and rules to values appropriate for cross (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Newbie question : IR comms with PC.
|
|
Hi all. I'm a third year engineering student from South Africa who is trying to complete a soccer playing robot in time for our robot intervarsity the 29th of March.I only started using the RCX (and legOS) days ago. I'm trying to transfer some (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Another possible makefile change
|
|
(...) Then for cross plateform compatibility, we should modify all the references to perl script to include the program name. It doesn't hurt Linux, and is essential in a DOS shell. (...) I researched your 'uname' suggestion and came up with the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: malloc() bug found -- BAD MEMORY REGION :-(
|
|
(...) Hi Martin: Its right here "(URL) try rebuild legOS with egcs-1.1.2, then diff the kernel assembler listings. Watch this space... (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Recommended change to MAKEFILE
|
|
(...) Hi, Luis... I think I need the same write permission to CVS if I want to commit the bounch of changes I've already write... ;-) Marcus supposed I was already enabled, but I got: cvs [server aborted]: "commit" requires write access to the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Another possible makefile change
|
|
(...) Although *nix system's try to figure out the interpreter for a script if you don't provide it, it doesn't harm to do so. Thus, actually you dont't have to distinct 2 cases here. We could simply use the MERGEMAP you suggest for all currently (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: malloc() bug found -- BAD MEMORY REGION :-(
|
|
(...) i vaguely remember this patch was necessary to get gcc-2.95.x to work, but somehow lost the patch. Therefore, i'm still working with egcs-1.1.2. Maybe that's the difference ? Could you tell me where to find the patch ? thanks, Martin. (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
