|
|
 | | Re: is IR considered broken?
|
| Sorry it took so long to reply, Mark... I somehow seem to have deleted your mail and only noticed it on the newsgroup by accident. Here are my thoughts. (...) Uhuh. This is (apparently) not a unique experience. (...) I have not had that experience, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | random numbers
|
| I'm most of the way to getting it working myself, but I was curious to see if anyone has implemented a random number generator in their bot. Anyone? Anyone? -Luis ###...### Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand. -Anonymous (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | is IR considered broken?
|
| The precompiled tm-and-ir, kinda works for me. It is pretty good at receiving data, but the transmitted message often has garbage. When I compile it myself using the latest legOS snapshot, it always transmits garbage, others seem to have seen the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: more fun with cross-compilers
|
| Well, neither the latest release of egcs nor the latest binutils 2.9.1 seems to do it. Apparently, though, the beta binutils (2.9.4, use at your own risk, blah, blah, blah) works. The gcc compilation is now crashing in a different location. Using my (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: more fun with cross-compilers
|
| Thanks for the help, Matt. solaris2.7 was correctly selected as the host by conf.guess, so that is not the problem. I would have no authority to apply any patches, even if I could find them, so I'm building egcs-1.1.2 instead. We'll see how that (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
