Subject:
|
is IR considered broken?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Jul 1999 20:19:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
971 times
|
| |
|
|
The precompiled tm-and-ir, kinda works for me. It is pretty good at
receiving data, but the transmitted message often has garbage. When I
compile it myself using the latest legOS snapshot, it always transmits
garbage, others seem to have seen the same thing. I've written some
very simple programs which use IR, and they seem to lock up as soon as
an IR function is called.
Some questions I have:
1. Was it ever considered to be working (stable)? What was the last
working version?
2. Is it considered to be broken under the current snapshot?
3. If it is broken is anyone actively working on fixing it? If not I'll
take a stab at it.
4. If others have working code that uses IR, can you post it?
thanks,
Mark Falco
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: is IR considered broken?
|
| Sorry it took so long to reply, Mark... I somehow seem to have deleted your mail and only noticed it on the newsgroup by accident. Here are my thoughts. (...) Uhuh. This is (apparently) not a unique experience. (...) I have not had that experience, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | Re: is IR considered broken?
|
| (...) I have working IR code, but it does not work with LegOS. It works with that "custom, as-yet-unreleased version of Librcx" I mention every so often. It probably wouldn't take much to port it to LegOS. Changes would be: - modify hook to get a (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
