 | | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
Stephen, <snip> (...) Well, the only thing that it is complaining about (that I had to remove) is the use of const void func_decl(...) Really, I want to know what the difference is between: const void foo(void) --- and --- void foo(void) Does the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
(...) What compile errors? Max. (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
(...) What makes you think it is incomplete. I have used that script to build a working cross-compiler for myself. (...) Well, you will need /h8x/bin in your path. Please post all errors you get using the cross tools you have built (not the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
(...) Am I understanding your diff? This version does not have the "hitachi" segment in the path? (...) And if I'm understanding this, this version of the tool chain does not support 'const'? If this is true, I'm not a fan of removing const from our (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
I have verified that the following configuration works (but not without some minor modifications). I am hoping to submit and include the modifications in a future release of legOS (maybe 0.2.7). Apparently, the GNU Toolchain available from the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) Well... see... now you boxed me in. ;-) of course you are correct. I was trying to give the benefit of the doubt to our author or to the cygwin developers. I really didn't think the version number should be in the path, but it was there, so I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
Here's the latest on this end: I have some kind of incomplete cross compiler that I build using Max Bowsher's script.... I unpacked the legOS directory did 'make OSTYPE=cygwin' And now I can download helloworld (which is compiled for some reason) (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Final prep. for 0.2.6 release
|
|
(...) I've modified my old patch "LNP checksum optimizations" so it can be applied against version 0.2.5.2, as Stephen asked me to. I've noticed that an older LNP patch -- see (URL) -- has been partly lost. That patch fixed some race conditions in (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
Kingsley, I did encounter this error, but didn't specifically list the error in my description. You will need to: (...) *** this is the specific fix for "No rule to make target" (...) *** I included the following steps in case you run into these (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
I just tried the 2000r1_i686-cygwin32...00-hms.zip and now I get "make: *** No rule to make target I think during my tinkering I'm after deleting some necessary makefile or something, if there's anyone who can pinpoint what I'm missing it would be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
