 | | Re: firmdl question
|
|
(...) I believe the units are tens of firmware bytes downloaded already. Oh, to point out the obvious, this is a ROM thing, not a firmdl thing. -Kekoa (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rom sensor read routine
|
|
(...) The current LegOS model really hammers the sensors, almost to the point of oversampling them. It only takes a short while (less than 0.1 ms, I think) to sample all four sensors; I think LegOS samples the next sensor immediately after finishing (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | firmdl question
|
|
When using firmdl to download a program to the RCX, what exactly do the numbers on the LCD indicate? Are there units I should be attaching to them, or are they just there to indicate progress without specific units? Just curious- Luis ###...### God (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rom sensor read routine
|
|
Hi Kekoa, (...) I am fixing this right now. (...) The current legOS sensor read cycle is this (i=illuminate, c=A/D conversion) S1: iii iii iii ccc S2: ccc iii iii iii S3: iii ccc iii iii S4: iii iii ccc iii If you find your sensor 2 readings to be (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) I believe transmission and reception are independent, i.e. the emitter circuit is decoupled from the receiver circuit. The hardware on the H8 is full duplex. Once you finish sending a byte, I think you get two interrupts: one saying a byte has (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Floating point emulation
|
|
I succeeded in using (emulated) floats in a legOS program. Here are some instructions in case some of you want/need to try 32 bit FP emulation. First of all I must point out that I have no merit at all in having got this result, a part from having (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) Just to state my interests: I'm mainly interested in the protocol, eg what level of service it would provide etc. In particular, I'm interested in layering a higher level gauranteed delivery protocol atop whatever simple one is provided. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
|
Here's the fair play policy: (URL) right. The Lego Group is exceedingly protective of their trademarks and intellectual property. If they haven't pursued action against legOS, it's very likely a deliberate policy rather than an oversight. Jonathan (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Ralph Hempel writes: [ ... ] (...) This is actually the book from which the thoughts I posted about arose. It is, indeed, a great book ;-) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
|
(...) Considering the past history of TLG, I'd say the fact that they haven't said anything about the name LegOS says a lot. TLG is paranoid about their trademark. Use Lego like a noun (as in, "I liked Legos a lot when I was a kid," or "I play with (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
