Subject:
|
Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 May 1999 23:21:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1581 times
|
| |
|
|
Nix <$}xinix{$@esperi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> kekoa@pixel.Stanford.EDU (Kekoa Proudfoot) writes:
>
> > Clearly it says something about TLG's
> > attitude toward LegOS that they haven't said anything about the name yet.
>
> Lego's always been a bit of a hobbyist's thing[1] so probably even TLG
> thinks there isn't much point in siccing lawyers on us, even if they
> disapproved.
>
> Big companies[2] lawyering hobbyists is really bad PR :)
>
>
> [1] not in any way derogatory, I'm a hobbyist too
>
> [2] I'd guess TLG counts...
Considering the past history of TLG, I'd say the fact that they haven't
said anything about the name LegOS says a lot.
TLG is paranoid about their trademark. Use Lego like a noun (as in, "I
liked Legos a lot when I was a kid," or "I play with Lego a lot") and put
that in a place (a web page, say) where they see it and their lawyers will
happily send you a letter telling you Lego must be used as an adjective,
not a noun (as in, "I liked Lego bricks a lot when I was a kid"). Their
lawyers will also be happy to send you a letter if you show the red Lego
symbol anywhere on a web page. There used to be a "Fair Play" page on
TLG's web site explaining all this, but I cannot seem to find the URL at
the moment.
Maybe I do not know what I am talking about and LegOS fits into some other
category, and Lego cannot claim to Markus that he chose the name
improperly. That is a possibility also.
-Kekoa
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
| Here's the fair play policy: (URL) right. The Lego Group is exceedingly protective of their trademarks and intellectual property. If they haven't pursued action against legOS, it's very likely a deliberate policy rather than an oversight. Jonathan (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
| (...) Lego's always been a bit of a hobbyist's thing[1] so probably even TLG thinks there isn't much point in siccing lawyers on us, even if they disapproved. Big companies[2] lawyering hobbyists is really bad PR :) [1] not in any way derogatory, (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
