Subject:
|
Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 May 1999 11:15:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1230 times
|
| |
|
|
kekoa@pixel.Stanford.EDU (Kekoa Proudfoot) writes:
> Clearly it says something about TLG's
> attitude toward LegOS that they haven't said anything about the name yet.
Lego's always been a bit of a hobbyist's thing[1] so probably even TLG
thinks there isn't much point in siccing lawyers on us, even if they
disapproved.
Big companies[2] lawyering hobbyists is really bad PR :)
[1] not in any way derogatory, I'm a hobbyist too
[2] I'd guess TLG counts...
--
/* I hate C so much... */ --- jwz, in driver/xscreensaver.c
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
| (...) Considering the past history of TLG, I'd say the fact that they haven't said anything about the name LegOS says a lot. TLG is paranoid about their trademark. Use Lego like a noun (as in, "I liked Legos a lot when I was a kid," or "I play with (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
| (...) Hahaha, regarding that LegOS is more of a library than an OS, my opinion too. But you have to admit the name has some appeal, even if it is something of a misnomer... :) Clearly it says something about TLG's attitude toward LegOS that they (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
