 | | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) Just to state my interests: I'm mainly interested in the protocol, eg what level of service it would provide etc. In particular, I'm interested in layering a higher level gauranteed delivery protocol atop whatever simple one is provided. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
|
Here's the fair play policy: (URL) right. The Lego Group is exceedingly protective of their trademarks and intellectual property. If they haven't pursued action against legOS, it's very likely a deliberate policy rather than an oversight. Jonathan (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Ralph Hempel writes: [ ... ] (...) This is actually the book from which the thoughts I posted about arose. It is, indeed, a great book ;-) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
|
(...) Considering the past history of TLG, I'd say the fact that they haven't said anything about the name LegOS says a lot. TLG is paranoid about their trademark. Use Lego like a noun (as in, "I liked Legos a lot when I was a kid," or "I play with (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
|
(...) Lego's always been a bit of a hobbyist's thing[1] so probably even TLG thinks there isn't much point in siccing lawyers on us, even if they disapproved. Big companies[2] lawyering hobbyists is really bad PR :) [1] not in any way derogatory, (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: HOWTO v 0.1
|
|
(...) Not ATM. (If I get gdb actually *working* with the LegOS I'll do a little HOWTO for that and stick it on the web, though... has anyone got it working right yet? I'm not stuck or anything, I just haven't finished getting it running.) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | tm-and-ir.c
|
|
Is anyone else having problems with this? The receive and display part works fine but it won't send "Hello World" when I press the View button. The srec from the LegOS home page works fine but if I build it myself it doesn't. I've tried both the web (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm being stupid. But how?
|
|
(...) Hahaha, regarding that LegOS is more of a library than an OS, my opinion too. But you have to admit the name has some appeal, even if it is something of a misnomer... :) Clearly it says something about TLG's attitude toward LegOS that they (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: HOWTO v 0.1
|
|
(...) Thanks (I think...) (...) Because I've found that it is significantly faster, and nearly canonical (as, technically speaking, it is part of the same domain, despite being hosted elsewhere(Stanford, IIRC.)) The only reason I found it in the (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | I'm being stupid. But how?
|
|
I've written a test program using the 19990330 LegOS snapshot[1], and it's misbehaving oddly. The program looks like this: (the headers are the result of my frobbing the LegOS headers to refer to <mindstorms/{legOS header}>...) #include (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
