| | reliable lnp ...
|
|
Hi, i always thought that LNP isnt reliable. Although this seems to be true in general, because lnp.c does not send any acknowlege-packets back, when downloading code (program.c) acknowledge-packets ARE sent back to to the PC (DLL), right ? So my (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: RFC compliant TCP/IP and /or a new Version of LNP
|
|
(...) There was a while back, but I haven't heard anything for a while. (...) You might try one of the embedded versions of Linux. ROSCO (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | RFC compliant TCP/IP and /or a new Version of LNP
|
|
Hi, is there someone who is currently working on a real (RFC-compliant) TCP/IP implementation for legOS to make the lnp obsolete ? Does anybody know where to find an extremely small TCP/IP implementation that could be ported to legOS ? PS: When will (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: lnp rcx hostaddress
|
|
(...) Hi, could you please post the code ? Thanks Cu, Olaf "Dammit Jim, I'm a programmer not a brain surgeon!" (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: problem with floating point numbers (legOS 0.2.5)
|
|
(...) Yes, the gcc version (2.96) which comes with RH 7.1 doesn't compile the things older versions used to do it. For example try to recompile kernel 2.2.5 and you'll see a strange error con checksum.S. As far as I know 2.96 is not a stable (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|