|
|
 | | Re: Parallel sensor problem
|
| (...) I don't know if this is your problem, but the input ports have polarity (one lead is connected to ground and the other to +5V through a resistor, if I remember correctly). Have you tried to change polarities? (...) Maybe the problem is not in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: LegOS 0.2.5 and LNP
|
| (...) On the RCX the LNP handlers are called from an interrupt handler, so after the execution of lnp_*_set_handler() you can safely assume that the old handler will not be called any more. On a PC things are different, there is a problem. I didn't (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: C++ OverHead
|
| I seem to recall someone doing some testing that showed that C++ programs worked out to take out somewhere around 2 to 3 times the space of comparable C programs. However, I'm sure that varies. Luis (...) ---...--- "Nobody ever said that democracy (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Motor Speed value interpretation?
|
| (...) As far as I can tell, the speed value really affects power output. This indirectly affects speed, but not in a very happy way. You end up with a wide range of values that give you nearly the same speed, then a very short range that decreases (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | C++ OverHead
|
| Hi all, a simple question ( I hope) I'm running a small GA on my rcx block , and I'm fairly happy qwith my results so far, it evolves well tot he conditions, however I'd like to try something new <g>... I'm going to try to evolve sub-sumptive (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
