| |
I seem to recall someone doing some testing that showed that C++ programs
worked out to take out somewhere around 2 to 3 times the space of
comparable C programs. However, I'm sure that varies.
Luis
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Ciaran Jessup wrote:
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:47:56 GMT
> From: Ciaran Jessup <ciaran@redhotant.com>
> To: lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos@lugnet.com
> Subject: C++ OverHead
>
> Hi all, a simple question ( I hope)
>
> I'm running a small GA on my rcx block , and I'm fairly happy qwith my
> results so far, it evolves well tot he conditions, however I'd like to try
> something new <g>...
> I'm going to try to evolve sub-sumptive architecture. To do this I'd like
> to evolve an 'instinctual' layer and a more 'cogniscant' layer. To do this
> I'd like to
> re-write my GA in a more object-orientated fashion. Now I know C++ can be
> used with the legOS system, but I'd like to know how much of a memory/speed
> over head this would impose on my code, as both these things are important
> to me
>
> Any help would be gladly received :)
> - Ciaran
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nobody ever said that democracy was simple or efficient."
Florida Election Board Member Bob Crawford.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | C++ OverHead
|
| Hi all, a simple question ( I hope) I'm running a small GA on my rcx block , and I'm fairly happy qwith my results so far, it evolves well tot he conditions, however I'd like to try something new <g>... I'm going to try to evolve sub-sumptive (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
