 | | Re: compiler problem - help needed please
|
|
John- Thanks a bunch for finding that. I'll check that fix into CVS this afternoon. Luis (...) ---...--- "It's clear to us that Microsoft isn't the competition anymore. They are our environment." WordPerfect manager, talking about Word ---...--- (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Packet Handlers on RCX
|
|
(...) Markus can just about definitely handle any questions. Unfortunately, he no longer responds to much of anything. :| Anyway, thanks for the detailed response, Marek... Luis ---...--- "It's clear to us that Microsoft isn't the competition (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Packet Handlers on RCX
|
|
(...) In legOS v0.2.3 and probably in v0.2.4 they are still called from the interrupt handler (rx_handler). (...) The interrupt handling should be fast, hence any heavy proccessing in lnp_handler is discouraged. Msleep, malloc and similiar functions (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have the updated 0.2.4 source?
|
|
Man, that was fast! I just posted that. Thanks Luis! I'll check it out tonight. Dave (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have the updated 0.2.4 source?
|
|
There is no 0.2.5 as of yet- there may be within a couple of weeks. There really aren't many substantial changes (mainly C++, two very, very small bugfixes.) If you are interested in testing what is in CVS right now I've posted a tarball here: (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
