|
|
 | | Re: legOS is great!
|
| (...) Luis, this would be great. Obviously I don't have anything at all to contribute at present moment, but will do as soon as I have something worth to be shared. (...) Yes please. I wait for your URL. Thanks Mario (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: legOS is great!
|
| (...) I'd love to set-up (and even host) such a depository. However, at the moment, I don't have much to contribute. As I'm working my rear-end off right now, that should change by friday, but :-) (...) Yeah. I was thinking about a HOWTO, in fact. I (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | legOS is great!
|
| Last weekend I finished setting up my PC (win 95) to use legOS. It took some more than a while to be ready, but now I'm absolutely happy with it. legOS is simply great and I'm very intrigued with it now. I'd like to thank Markus L. Noga and all the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Installation trouble with Linux
|
| My system is a Redhat 5.1, i586. I had some problems installing the LegOS. Here are the steps I took. 1. I successfully installed binutils, unpacked the legOS-0.1.7 package. 2. I installed the egcs-1.1b package with the exact options given in the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | PS
|
| As an addendum to my light message, I checked direct-sensor.h, and the numbers there seem to work out just fine. Could this be a compiler problem on my part? Just another thought- Luis ###...### "They call the faithful to their knees to hear the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
