|
|
 | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| Hi Tobias, If you're a computer programmer, I'd definitly suggest using something other than the RCX Code method of writing programs for the RCX. NQC is a nice environment if you know C. If you know a language that supports ActiveX, you can program (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| (...) Depends how hard you want to work. With LegOS or pbForth, which replace the official firmware, you can program the hardware at the machine level, so you can do very advanced stuff. With NQC (or RoboLab) you're still limited by Lego's firmware, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| I got my RIS a couple of weeks ago, and I have been building simple robots and programmed them using the program on the RIS cd. I´ve heard that you can program the RCX in very advanced ways, multitasking and so on. How advanced can it be? How do you (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: OO programing in RCX
|
| Hi Mathew, There are no objects on the RCX, in the sense that there are no vtables on the RCX. I made no changes to spirit.ocx. But I definitely think of the RCX code in terms of objects now. There are "brain" objects, "map" objects, "identity" (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | | Re: OO programing in RCX
|
| (...) I'm curious -- are you making it so you can think about your RCX program in OO terms, or just the VB program that sends opcodes? (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
