 | | Re: Communication with PC using NQC
|
|
(...) /Vlad (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Communication with PC using NQC
|
|
(...) You might find the following helpful... (URL) again, you might not. jack j-perdue@tamu.edu (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Communication with PC using NQC
|
|
(...) Taking the example of the maze-walker, the PC software should be able to keep track of the position of the robot and direct it through the maze. (...) Yes, I looked at the code and it only needs a higher-level wrapper. (...) Yes, it does, (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX motor voltage
|
|
(...) I am using the motors that came with the RCX. (...) Hmmm - do you propose to ensure the delay in the relay circuit or programmatically? If in the circuit, how? (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX motor voltage
|
|
Wes, relays would work pretty well. (Still, how much current do your motors draw???) The LEGO motors draw about .35 Amps (350 Milliamperes) You could connect two 5V coil relays , each with a diode in series with the coil, connected oppositely to (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Communication with PC using NQC
|
|
(...) Could you be more specific on "querying its state" and "high-level commands"? If you're willing to write custom C++ code, you can pretty much do whatever you want on top of the rcxlib stuff from the NQC source base. Its pretty easy to send (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Use PC's IR port instead of IR tower?
|
|
Hello, Is it possible to use a PC's IR port, instead of the IR tower, to communicate with an RCX? (I have a Dell Inspiron 3500). -- Brad Aisa baisa@NOSPAMbrad-aisa.com -- PGP public keys available at: (URL) faire." (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX motor voltage
|
|
(...) I can think of two other possibilities: The best approach is probably to add more gears so that the motors don't have to work as hard to move the platform. The platform will move more slowly, but at least it will move at all. (Hmm... That (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX motor voltage
|
|
(...) These solutions bring up problems of their own: using a motor to operate a switch (battery box or Lego switch) requires monitoring the switch state to determine on/off status. Also, there will be a time delay while the motor moves from one (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Communication with PC using NQC
|
|
(...) Thanks for the explanation. So, it's back to the basics! ;-) I did not explain my question very well, I think. What I would like to do is to steer the RCX from the PC, by querying its state and send it high-level commands (for example to make (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
