Subject:
|
Re: Battery voltage levels
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 22:29:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2689 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Dean Husby writes:
> There is going to be a difference between the 1.0's (with jack) and the
> others. The 1.0's have an extra rectifier bridge that eats up about .3 volts
> so that you can use either the built in batteries or the external jack. The
> 1.5+'s don't have this and therefore have less resistance in the circuits.
>
> Dean
Thanks, this explains the difference. However, I'm still interested in the
voltage levels people get. Does anyone use NiCads? Or rechargeable alkalines?
Or something else I've not thought of?
Barney.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Battery voltage levels
|
| "Barney Hilken" <b.hilken@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:H3MuHC.2CM@lugnet.com... (...) volts (...) The (...) circuits. [snip] (...) alkalines? (...) I use Nickel Hydride rechargeables in an RCX1.0, at least that's what it says on the top - (...) (22 years ago, 8-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Battery voltage levels
|
| "Barney Hilken" <b.hilken@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:H3LyHy.76H@lugnet.com... (...) version 2.0 (...) batteries: the (...) variation (...) on (...) email (...) Robot (...) don't (...) There is going to be a difference between the 1.0's (...) (22 years ago, 7-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
