To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / 1431
1430  |  1432
Subject: 
Re: RCX sensor interfaces - diodes
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx
Date: 
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:12:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1723 times
  
The main advantage of the BAT85 is the lower voltage drop (about 0.3 Volt
against 0.7 Volt for the 1N4148).

Chris Page wrote:

I'm in the middle or working out the circuit for my gray encoder sensor and
looking at the various interface schemes. I notice that most examples use
1N4148 diodes, but one site I have visited (but I can't for the life of me
remember which :/) recommended BAT85 (Schottky barrier diodes) because they
"are more linear."

Does anyone have any advice or opinion on this?



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: RCX sensor interfaces - diodes
 
I think the real point here is that it is usually necessary to incorporate a bridge network of six diodes to interface to the RCX sensor inputs. The signalling current must pass through at least two series diodes to get to the RCX terminals - a (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

Message is in Reply To:
  RCX sensor interfaces - diodes
 
I'm in the middle or working out the circuit for my gray encoder sensor and looking at the various interface schemes. I notice that most examples use 1N4148 diodes, but one site I have visited (but I can't for the life of me remember which :/) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR