 | | Re: Does anyone have an extra usb IR tower for sale?
|
|
Chris - (...) The last time I asked them, they said they would not ship outside the US under any circumstances. However, you can e- them at <pldcatalog@pitsco.com> and check whether this is still the case. Cheers JP Serious LEGO: (URL) (24 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have an extra usb IR tower for sale?
|
|
(...) Do you know if there is anywhere similar in the UK? I've been trying to get my hands on some extra rotation sensors, but finding a supplier in the UK is practically impossible. Does anyone know if Pitsco will ship to the UK? (24 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have an extra usb IR tower for sale?
|
|
(...) You can order one from Pitsco. See recent posts for details. (URL) the tower doesn't come with drivers. You need to get the RIS 2.0 software upgrade or the ROBOLAB 2.5 software in order for the tower to function. We need to develop a (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have an extra usb IR tower for sale?
|
|
(...) Rob, Pitsco has the USB IR Tower available as a seperate unit...$29.00...the product code is: F979783 ...their number is (800) 362-4308, or (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Does anyone have an extra usb IR tower for sale?
|
|
I'm tired of waiting on TLG to make it available. Hell, I haven't even received the 2.0 upgrade I ordered in the first part of August yet!!! Who knows when They will ever make it available... -Rob (24 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Web site up
|
|
All -- Finally overcame my HTML-blindness (mostly!) and got a web site up. Code and DATs for most of the robots. Hope you like them. (URL) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Sending ir packets
|
|
(...) (URL) get you loads of info. Björn (24 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Sending ir packets
|
|
I am writing a program, and it doesnt work. Right now im just trying to make sure I can interface with the serial port properly. So I am sending: 55 ff 00 51 ae 03 fc 54 ab At 2400 baud, 8 data bits, odd parity, and one stop bit. It doesnt work. The (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Using two RCX bricks in one robot
|
|
As long as there is some surface for the IR to bounce off, the bricks do not have to face each other. Sending messages is the technique that is used and is very effective. You can do this with any of the various programming languages. -- Bob Fay (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Using two RCX bricks in one robot
|
|
I'm kicking around the idea of building a Mindstorm's based entry for the Trinity College Fire-Fighting Home Robot Contest (see (URL) ). I may be mistaken, but it seems impractical to attempt this task with a single brick... there just don't seem (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | MacNQC 3.0 Beta
|
|
Hi All, I've uploaded a beta version of MacNQC 3.0. New features are: * Added syntax coloring for NQC source code in the Editor Window. * Made the preference window multi-paned. It now has a Compiler Pane, a Communications Pane, an Editor Pane, and (...) (24 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | MacNQC 3.0a1 beta release
|
|
Hi All, I've uploaded a beta version of MacNQC. New features are: * Added syntax coloring for NQC source code in the Editor Window. * Made the preference window multi-paned. It now has a Compiler Pane, a Communications Pane, an Editor Pane, and a (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
|
The way I read the article it didn't seem that they were so much upset that he had come up with the new OS, but rather that he had named it legOS. No matter how you look at it, or what excuse he can come up for choosing that name, it is pushing the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
|
(...) I agree with you, Jürgen. It seems that we have to contend with taht viewpoint though. Hopefully if any of tyhe new product line doesn't do as well as expected, we will not see some genius in the company decide to go after people who add value (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
|
(...) I think this is speculation by the author of the article. Apart from the issue about names and trademarks, for me this article shows an extremely irritating attitude towards customers, sue people as soon as they use something in a different (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 3.0 and legOS 1.2.4
|
|
This is copyied from "Mindstorms Not Just a Kid's Toy" by Paul Wallich in IEEE Spectrum September 2001: "With version 2.0 of the RCX firmware due this fall, the original hardware may have gone as far as its designers can take it, and what directions (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | image of firm0328
|
|
We can view the image of firm0309 at (URL) the firm0328 is big different from old one, does anyone make a new image for firm0328? Zhengrong (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
|
Having registered legOS.sourceforge.net (on Markus's word that TLG had given him permission to use the name), having run the last release of legOS, and having not heard anything from TLG myself, I can say that there are no plans in this corner of (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | RE: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
|
Ross crawford points to: (...) I can see their point too. As long as it's only about the name then I can't see anyone getting too upset. It's just a name, after all. But if it's about the replacement firmware, then I have more to worry about. So do (...) (24 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
