Subject:
|
Re: Article on dead-reckoning with a Mindstorms robot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:12:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1457 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Aaron Nabil writes:
>
> Loved your article, reminds me of the great stuff the Boulette Robotics
> club does.
>
> I was curious why you used differential steering instead of an
> adder/subtractor or synchro drive, were there some rule
> limitations on parts you could use?
Thanks for the kind words.
The Connecticut Robotics Society (CRS) dead-reckoning contest has no
special rules limiting the parts or technology used for the robot,
except that it not rely on any kind of external navigation aids
(such as laser-positioning or a differential GPS). Also, it's
a general robotics contest, not restricted to Lego hardware. While my
own choices were limited by the fact that I wanted to use the stock
Mindstorms kit (plus 2 rotation sensors), that wasn't the main reason
that I chose the differential steering system. Rather, I used it because
I had written an earlier web page giving navigation algorithms for
differential steering systems and wanted an opportunity
to "put my words into action."
gary
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
