Subject:
|
Re: Article on dead-reckoning with a Mindstorms robot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:42:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1638 times
|
| |
|
|
Loved your article, reminds me of the great stuff the Boulette Robotics
club does.
I was curious why you used differential steering instead of an
adder/subtractor or synchro drive, were there some rule
limitations on parts you could use?
"G.W. Lucas" <gwlucas@connix.com> wrote in message
news:GIuyqy.L6w@lugnet.com...
> I thought that those of you who are interested in using
> the Lego rotation sensors for dead-reckoning and navigation
> might find the following useful.
>
> This month's issue of the Seattle Robotics Society's
> "Encoder" includes an article I wrote about my
> RCX-based dead-reckoning robot. Last June, the robot
> did pretty well in a odometry contest held by the
> Connecticut Robotics Society ( http://www.ctrobots.org ).
> The article discusses software issues related to
> its operation.
>
> You may find the article at
>
> http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200108/using_a_pid.html
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
