 | | Re: light sensor multiplexer
|
|
"Nitin Patil" <gn1721@lycos.com> wrote in message news:GAKC9v.F5A@lugnet.com... (...) With the 0.1uF in parallel with the 4.7K, the voltage on the clock circuit is still above the measurement voltage during the normal read interval. It doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor multiplexer
|
|
(...) Regarding the power used I think you are correct since it is or the order of few microamp. but even then your design can not ( rather Do not ) switch power. Also what I did not like in your desigh is 4.7K resistor. which changes reading in (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor multiplexer
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Rainer Balzerowski writes: hi Rainer (...) This is not true since you need to maximum of 60ms after that time out occurs in microconterolor and it chanes the sensor. yes that is true that it is slow for your application. I (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor multiplexer
|
|
(...) I'll bet you can't even measure the power used in the two CMOS parts. Why don't you publish your design so we can pick on it? Michael Gasperi (25 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor multiplexer
|
|
Hi Nitin, (...) Yes, sadly but true. That's why I have to use a battery anyway. (Or an output, but I would save it for other tasks.) (...) I understand. I should have explained what i'm doing with the sharps, sorry. I have a task running, that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
