 | | Re: IR Problems
|
|
(...) tom@tomlohre.com Dear Claude, Thanks for your message. I have delayed in replying to the excellent advice concerning communication with more than one RCX. Last night in a dream I realized that I could just bypass communication placing two push (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Problems
|
|
(...) Thank you for the excellent information concerning communication with more than one RCX. Last night in a dream I realized that I could just bypass communication placing two push button sensors where needed driving the additional RCX. The (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Problems
|
|
Hi Tom, I tried to send you a private mail, but the email address I have doesn't work anymore. Could you give me the new one? -Claude (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: IR Problems
|
|
Elizabeth is quite right. It's easy to get collisions on the IR "bus" if two devices are sending (or replying) simultaneously. What I've done in the past with two RCXs is define one RCX as primary that is periodically (every 100 to 250 milliseconds (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: IR Problems
|
|
RCX IR does not require direct line of sight. All sorts of reflections will work. Especially if you're in a "smallish" (bedroom, home office) room. The RCX firmware always has the IR turned off. "Wait for mail" and "send mail" is just a higher (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
