 | | An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
Hi, all, I know this might just be a shot in the blue sky, but anyway: Lego is most propably working on a new RCX system. At the Legofan site, there is a discussion about things that should be in a new RCX, and someone mentioned Bluetooth as a (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: different output power at different ports?
|
|
(...) I've discovered a thread in legofan (URL) that talks about new features of a possible RCX 3.0. Is there more information that can be handed out? - Dave (20 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: container in a container error
|
|
(...) Thanks Claude. I look forward to implementing the correction. Tom (20 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX to RCX LNP
|
|
Hi. (...) That would be a fun state machine to set up... ;-) (...) It only does so when it receives opcodes between 0xf0 - 0xf7 or a standard firmware message (0x55). Of the first eight, only 0xf0 and 0xf1 currently require further action, with 0xf0 (...) (20 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: container in a container error
|
|
(...) This just was an forgotten bug that with older Robolab versions didn't harm. The solution is to remove the "Value of red container" and replace it by a blue container constant list ("User3") while selecting "RED". -Claude (20 years ago, 15-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
