 | | Re: NQC release
|
|
Ahh...I shouldn't add comments to anything before my first green tea of the morning. I moved line 56 back to public: and went to line 81 and found private: was already there... 81 private: 82 class Chunk 83 { 84 public: 85 86 const UByte* GetData() (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC release
|
|
(...) I was not sufficiently clear. My apologies. Line 56 needs to remain unchanged: public: Comments, by the way, in C++ are specified by '//' rather than '#'. I say that because it looks like your compiler is complaining about a line (56) that (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC release
|
|
Making progress: I changed the public: to private: in RCX_Image.h and here was the output after I did a `make clean`: [root@aluminum nqc-3.1.r1]# make g++ -o bin/mkdata -Inqc/ -Iplatform/ mkdata/mkdata.cpp nqc/SRecord.cpp bin/mkdata (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC release
|
|
(...) Can you try adding "private:" directly above the declaration of the nested type Chunk in RCX_Image.h? I'd like to confirm that that change fixes the problem. If any more compile errors (or warnings) show up let me know here or via email. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC release
|
|
Hi John! Thanks for the new release. On my Linux box I get a compile error. uname -a: Linux aluminum 2.6.10-1.770_FC3smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 24 14:20:06 EST 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux [root@aluminum nqc-3.1.r1]# make g++ -o bin/mkdata -Inqc/ (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC release
|
|
I've released a new version of NQC today (3.1r1). (URL) would be most grateful if a few non-Windows platform folks could download the source release and make sure it builds and functions correctly on your favorite platform. I *think* I fixed all the (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: What that displayed on my RCX2.0?
|
|
(...) This is just the datalog display. It indicates, in 25% increments, how full the datalog is. This indicator is totally harmless, and can be ignored. If you want to get rid of it just download and run the following program: task main() { (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Northeast Region ROBOLAB Conference
|
|
I don't work for the LEGO Company, but I felt that this announcement should be posted in the official .lego group. -Suz (URL) reposting the announcement of a special event. This conference, at the LEGO Enfield HQ, is a big deal! For those who don't (...) (20 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.lego.announce, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.events, lugnet.robotics.edu, lugnet.edu, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: power levels clarification
|
|
(...) I couldn't call myself an expert either! In your second way of looking at it, the full voltage and full current are already multiplied to give full power for part of the time. I=(Vcc-Eb)/R Current I, Voltage Vcc, Back EMF Eb and motor (...) (20 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: problem downloading
|
|
Hi, (...) this means that the class files are in a newer format that Lejos cannot use, so the compiler needs a '-target 1.1' option (with Java 1.5 you may also need '-source 1.2'). It seems your Lejos version is rather old, the current ones put the (...) (20 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
