 | | Re: BrickOS 0.9.0 success
|
|
Andrew, How fun to hear of your 2.4 success with brickos-0.9.0 It is good to hear that this was possible. With respect to your next efforts I have news... (...) Both brickos-0.9.0 and lnpd-0.9.0 are now debian packages. If these are useful in your (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Sending Commands to Spybot from RCX - Question from a Beginner to Comm area.
|
|
(...) First of all, my apologies for not answering you via email. I've been a bit busy at work. I needed to run some tests myself before I could properly respond as well. The 0x9223 from the RCX happens to match the IR sent out by the Spybot (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | BrickOS 0.9.0 success
|
|
Hello all -- I have a Linux system with a USB Lego IR tower, and have been intermittently poking around on the web (once every few weeks) in hopes of getting a brickOS system to work on it, with varying levels of enthusiasm. I've gotten it to go (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX3 - Can extra hardware functionality be added?
|
|
(...) I have a proposal that would theoretically allow an RCX to use 49 motors and 147 active sensors (or 588 switches!). This has the potential to control an entire Ball Contraption or railway! The idea may be expandable to four times those (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX3 - Can extra hardware functionality be added?
|
|
hi so IMHO don't expect more outputs because of the power 3 motors + 3 sensors + mainboard have to be powered by bateries some time ago i proposed to make connectors smaller (URL) good think is the size of these connectors of course second is that (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
