To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / *8960 (-10)
  remote
 
Hello, I’m just recently getting back into playing with Legos. I bought my first house and had to fix it up before I could play. BrickOS was a lot easier to get into this time around thanks to BricxCC. BrickOS itself is better documented and has new (...) (20 years ago, 8-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  remote
 
Hello, I’m just recently getting back into playing with Legos. I bought my first house and had to fix it up before I could play. BrickOS was a lot easier to get into this time around thanks to BricxCC. BrickOS itself is better documented and has new (...) (20 years ago, 8-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: NQC contolling motors
 
(...) Not exactly. What NQC allows you to do is set one of 8 patterns of pulse width modulation (PWM) for an output. So for instance the highest power level is "always on" (9V for 100% of a cycle), while a lower power setting is a mixture of "on" & (...) (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  NQC contolling motors
 
Hi all, I have some questions about controling RCX motors using NQC. I am using Lego 43362 motors. As I understand it has maximum RPM 219 at 9V In NQC I see that I can st the speed of the motors at 8 different stages. I can not find though how the (...) (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Book reviews of this?
 
Does anyone have any experience with this text? (URL) seems like a good text for the basics on up (and the "teaser" looks good), but I'd like to have some first-person accounts. (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
 
  Re: bad motor output because of lego firmware?!
 
(...) That's right. I simply didn't expect any problems with NQC + Lepomux because I assumed that any RCX-OS has the ability to directly control the motor output. If I had used NQC a little bit more, I surely would've noticed that strange output (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: SetUserDisplay?
 
(...) correct. Kevin (20 years ago, 30-Oct-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: SetUserDisplay?
 
(...) Thanks Dave. I didn't notice the RCX2 option in Bricxcc, works great now! Just to clarify, the only difference between RCX 1 & 2 (from the compile target POV) is the firmware it's running? ROSCO (20 years ago, 30-Oct-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: SetUserDisplay?
 
(...) My guess is that NQC hasn't been told to target the 2.0 api, so it is defaulting to 1.0 which does not have SetUserDisplay(). See (URL) for a more detailed explanation. Dave (20 years ago, 30-Oct-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  SetUserDisplay?
 
I can't seem to get SetUserDisplay to compile. When I compile my program, it gets "Error: undefined function 'SetUserDisplay'". I thought it might be the version of NQC (3.0a1) so I downloaded 2.5r3, but same error. Seems strange because (...) (20 years ago, 30-Oct-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR