 | | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Nope. I knew there was a certain amount configurability in brickOS, but I assumed it would be hard to get it down to a minumum. (...) With librcx, I started out with the minimum and added only what I needed. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC beta 2
|
|
I have uploaded a beta copy of NQC 3.0 a2 to my new NQC website at (URL) try this version out and let me know if you experience any problems with subroutines with the Spybotics target (which did not return correctly in all previous NQC versions). (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | BricxCC home page is moving!
|
|
At the end of last year I finally signed up for high speed internet access from Comcast. Included in the agreement (with my wife) is that I would get rid of my long association with AOL. I've had the JohnBinder AOL email address for many, many years (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics.scout, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | NQC & Spybot subroutine code generation bug
|
|
I have just received a report from a user that NQC programs containing subroutines do not execute correctly against the Spybot platform. I have confirmed that this is a problem with all versions of NQC which support the Spybot brick. This program: (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Problem with rcxTcl.exe and the USB IR tower
|
|
I have a tentative solution to this problem. I've written a DLL that will also allow me to change some interesting stuff like baud rate and imeouts on the tower. This may allow us to finally get full control of the RCX USB tower! Hopefully I can (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | dll error deleting program
|
|
Hi all. Yestaday I installed brickOS-2.60 and compiled it with gcc 3.2. Downloading the firmware with firmdl3 works great but I cannot download any program with dll getting the usual "error deleting program". Maybe is a problem with LNP and dll (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) I am admittedly biased toward BrickOS; however, I am wondering if you attempted to free some memory in BrickOS by disabling features that you didn't need? If you are only going to run one program (whether single threaded or multi), you can (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) I think most people seriously underestimated how hard building the robot would be. The funny thing is, all of rtlToronto's events have the same general premise: Build a robot that does something. Second, if you can make the robot do it well, (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) NQC compiles not quite C code into LEGO firmware opcodes. You download the .rcx result, and LEGO firmware interprets the program. This makes it slow. QuiteC and brickOS both use H8 native C compilers that spit out H8 assembly code directly. (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Forgive a clueless question here, but is QuiteC different than NotQuiteC? If so where can I learn more about it? Thanks! The oldest mention of the term "QuiteC" I could find on LUGNET was only 3 weeks ago but MAYBE I'm searching wrong? see (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
