 | | Re: Global Objects was Strange RCX startup issues
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Yes, I took a peek at the dll code and it looks like only one packet type would have to be extended to add this additional information. When not using the program manager (i.e. linking the user program directly to BrickOS), then (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Linux legos install help me please
|
|
Wow thanks for the speedy response nanobapt. I am going to attempt to run legnoppix as a guestthrough VMware tonight. I will keep you posted on how that goes. Whati am really interested in is the math. Nano wrote (...) 1st Are you saying that (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) NQC is a language/compiler which works with the standard LEGO firmware(s). I don't anticipate that ever changing. But here's a glimpse of something new for the Spybot target that might be interesting to NQC users. Would 256 (or 128, if you (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Global Objects was Strange RCX startup issues
|
|
Doh! I think I just answered the question (of course it was After hitting send) Joseph Woolley wrote: [snip] > Also, I have a question (because of my limited knowledge of how the > __ctors and __dtors are managed): Would the two *for* loops in your (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Global Objects was Strange RCX startup issues
|
|
Mark, This is an interesting issue. Initially, after reading your post, I was thinking that it would be easy to add this support to BrickOS. Of course, this is only partially correct. For NON Task Manager builds (therefore no Program manager), it is (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Logging sensor data
|
|
Win 98 and Cygwin Thanks, Allen (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Logging sensor data
|
|
(...) What OS do you use ? nanobapt (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Logging sensor data
|
|
Hi nanobapt, Thanks for your help, I was sort of thinking along these lines. I know very little about LNP so apologies if I come across as a little ignorant. Is there an LNP server I can run on my machine to collect the data sent to the RCX tower? (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Logging sensor data
|
|
(...) You can combine both solutions ... Storage in the RCX memory and then send it by lnp (after 10 data for example) You need to test :) nanobapt (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Logging sensor data
|
|
Hi nanobapt, What I tend to do is sample a sensor every say 20ms and log the data over a period of upto about 5 seconds. In your opinion what would be the best method, local storage or realtime streaming via LNP?, can LNP stream at this speed? (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
