 | | Re: remote control and rcx
|
|
Chris Phillips's utterance expressed in news:HEL5rn.1DrD@lugnet.com: (...) okay - bought the rc after I had upgraded the old rcx. (...) hmm seems a little embarassing for TLC. I've had ir-devices for many years and this is the least functional thing (...) (21 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: remote control and rcx
|
|
(...) Chris, Do you own any Spybots? If you leave the remote in "ping" mode (as kids tend to), you will have a horrible time downloading anything. This has happened to me many times. I still do a little head scratching each time, until I think (...) (21 years ago, 9-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Dr. Vegetable's Virtual Remote
|
|
(...) Not GPL, really. More of a "come-n-get it" license. My programs are free to any taker for personal use, but are not automatically licensed for redistribution in shareware collections or warez sites without explicit permission. That being said, (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Dr. Vegetable's Virtual Remote
|
|
(...) Is your program under GPL (and then think about free mean :)) And do you want that I integret it to legnoppix ? nanobapt (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: remote control and rcx
|
|
(...) The RCX will not respond to the remote until you succeed in downloading the firmware. The built-in romware does not listen to the remote. The remote can be used with many RCXes at once, since it is a one-way protocol with no response messages. (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
