 | | New pbFORTH 106 release
|
|
This is a bulk mailing of notice of the new pbFORTH 106 release. If you don't want to be on this list, please email me so I can take you off. The latest and greatest pbFORTH is now available. Enhancements include: 1. Fixed issues with timers (thanks (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
This was my reaction too. In fact, I was gleefully skipping around with a printout! Congrats and thanks to those involved. -Suz. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
I am coming into the middle of this (or at the end considering the posting dates), and am hoping I don't sound like a fool putting out these ideas (since I don't yet know how legOS works). Is the RCX# used as a sort of ethernet MAC address? If you (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: TIMER 0 is flakey
|
|
(...) That's not all. Seems like I've left half of the words using the old calling convention..... I'll get 1.0.6 out and posted by tomorrow, along with the TCL gui and a small test suite. Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- The train stops at (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
Yahoo! Maybe we adult lego enthusiasts can finally come out of the closet & say, "were here, we like lego's, GET USED TO IT!!!" : ) Michael Aaron (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
(...) That's kind of only a tiny mention. I meant that it didn't really talk about it in-depth. That's what's so cool about the new article, IMHO -- it's a first step toward a larger awareness. --Todd (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
It does talk about the " using an open architecture system. " "MindStorms robot developers were creating code in a variety of languages like Visual Basic and C on their PCs and uploading the code to the RCX units. " John A. Donaldson (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Do the high resolution timers work?
|
|
(...) Yep, you've got the parameters backwards. Try FFFF 0 timer_set. Also, I'm not sure about numbers above 0x8000... I'm working on a TclTk interface for uploading firmware images to the RCX and for pbFORTH scripts. I ALMOST have the comment (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: TIMER 0 is flakey
|
|
(...) Looks like I'd better test this again, and maybe release 1.06... Sorry. Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- The train stops at the train station, The bus stops at the bus station, So why am I sitting at a work station? ---...--- Reply to: (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
(...) (I guess I should have posted, instead of going to lunch! ;-) But there *IS* a URL...they just didn't put http:// in front of it, so your browser may have missed it. They mentioned Markus' site ((URL) in that same paragraph. (They mention (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
(...) This is BIG NEWS and GREAT exposure for Markus and friends!!! -- a major business magazine recognizing the pursuits and achievements of adult LEGO fanatics on the net to extend the RCX technology toward greater heights! In May, Forbes also had (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I remember that! But aren't you supposed to do it mod 255 for maximum effectiveness? Cheers, Ben. -- (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | TIMER 0 is flakey
|
|
Hi Ralph, It looks like TIMER 0 is hosed in v1.05. Take a gander at this: ----- : time RCX_INIT 0 0 TIMER_SET 32 0 DO 0 TIMER_GET . LOOP ; ok time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 -32639 -32639 130 130 -32638 131 131 131 -32637 132 132 132 133 -32635 (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP Repost
|
|
Hi, I'm kinda new to LUGNET, so if I get this wrong - sorry! I'm interested in this LNP idea that seemed to be floating around a few months ago. Is it still alive, and if so what state has it got to? I would be grateful if someone can post or e-mail (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Do the high resolution timers work?
|
|
Hi Ralph, Are timer_SET and timer_GET working? I can't seem to get any non-zero values from them: RCX_INIT ok 0 FFFF timer_SET ok 0 timer_GET . 0 ok Am I missing something? Thanks, Jonathan (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | legOS and Markus in Forbes
|
|
Check it out here- brief, and unfortunately no URLs, but... (URL) (who is only slightly hurt that his documentation wasn't mentioned :) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | better test value for touch sensors
|
|
FYI: The simple-rover example uses an unsafe test value for touch sensors. Touch sensor should be tested against <0xf000, NOT <0x2000 (e.g. simple-rover.c) Reason: Not pressed has a constant value >0xf000. Pressed varies depending on battery change, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | The IR FIX -- was: Re: Is IR considered broken?
|
|
(...) I had the same problem. (...) Here's the fix: enclode the old handler code in #ifdef TRASH, use the new #else part. I'll say a few things about the motivation below. (If you prefer to patch, download (URL) it's based on LegOS 0.1.7 but should (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Laser Pointers
|
|
Are they legal in UK? Any Help Appreciated (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
The Mindstorms RCX Code software does the exact same thing as the code you listed, the only caveat is I think RCX Code uses power settings from 1 to 8 while NQC uses 0 to 7. Both result in the same bytecodes for the RCX to interpret. // turn A on (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
