 | | Errors compiling egcs
|
|
Hi, I've just downloaded and attempted to install the binutils, egcs, and LegOs on my computer as per the instructions at (URL) only difference between these instructions and what I have done is the path to where the software is to be installed. (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: which Linux distro?
|
|
(...) Good Idea ! I had no problem using legOS when using a RedHat 7.1, Mandrake8 or a Conectiva 6.0, As far as I remember, there is a Debian package available for legOS. So... no matter which distribution you'll use, it will be far better than (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Control the RCX from AppleScript
|
|
(...) Ahah! Check out the following SourceForge projects - still sadly in the VERY early stages! - for some potentially good news: (URL) too have USB devices that have been rendered useless by OS X and companies not wanting to bother upgrading (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | which Linux distro?
|
|
Hi, I am thinking of moving over to Linux, partly for legOS reasons (Lnp easier to set up for a start), but partly for other reasons (free software, morality etc, ie the usual waffle.) I am considering Redhat 7.2, Suse 7.3 personal or Suse 7.3 (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Control the RCX from AppleScript
|
|
Sorry for the quick updates, but Robot Controller 1.4b2 is now available! This adds the ability to control several motors simultaneously in AppleScript. I have also posted an example AppleScript Studio project which uses Robot Controller to drive a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect result
|
|
(...) Yes, this is what happens when one is used to just making everything long and not considering overflows. Even worse was that I was doing the math on the computer's calculator, but not looking at the intermediate result, just typing in the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC release 3.3.3.4
|
|
hi Guido, I just a very little time also the comming week, but my first impression is very good !! Thanks very much. And you said you weren't a fast programmer ;-) (...) It sound great indeed. (...) I couldn't get it to work, but maybe I did (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect result
|
|
(...) 256 * 128 = 32768, one higher as the biggest positive integer value. The cast to long would help, but your cast is too late. I have not tested, but I think rc += ( (long)b->magnitude * (long)TA_costable[...] ) >> 7; will help. Try output in (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Incorrect result
|
|
<snipped code> (...) Robert, this is a classic problem with ranges of singed numbers in C rx = (long)(a->magnitude * TA_costable[a->direction]) >> 7; I don't have an RCX in frot of me, but I think you need to cast a->magnitude to long before the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Incorrect result
|
|
This problem, unlike the other, is definitely not a result of my eyes/brain being tired or something. I thoroughly displayed every value before and after evaluation and the result is ***WRONG***. Here is the code and the values: typedef struct { int (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
