|
|
 | | Re: Wishlist leJOS
|
| (...) I think that the datalogging area is just a special limited firmware array, but , IIRC, since it mentions nowhere that you have to remember to keep the datalog size into account. Try using the opcodes, and see what works. Andy -- See my Visual (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
| | | | | Re: Wishlist leJOS
|
| (...) It does answer my question, but I was thinking that a feature like that would be more memory efficient. It seems to me (knowing very little of programmimg small devices) that there are special OP codes (looking at Keokea Proudfoot's RCX (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
| | | | | cvs changes
|
| Hi, I checked into the CVS repository some changes today. They include: A) a fix to util/dll-src/Makefile to reference ../../kernel/lnp.c, so a symbolic link or copy is not required. B) small changes to various makefiles to get c++ support working (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: c++
|
| Hi, Sorry that I've been AWOL! Attached is a set of patches you can apply to the 2.5 distribution to clean up most of the make process. You will still have to correctly specify the TOOLPREFIX in Makefile.common, or via the make command line. You can (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Wishlist leJOS
|
| There's no need to implement this because Java allows you to create an array and store as much data as you want in it. You have a lot more power by using an array over the NQC feature, which I believe is limited to something like 100 numbers. Hope (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
|
