 | | Fast data acquistion on PC from RCX ?
|
|
I want to do fast data acquistion (100 samples/second) continuously with the RCX and transport the data in realtime to a PC. I'm building a oscilloscope to monitor sensors and globals variables on the PC, a bit like "Mr. Sensor Program" (URL) was (...) (23 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
(...) Well I'm glad you apologized. :) I just finished downloading and testing your previous version only to find that there is even a newer one. I really like the new editing features BTW. The multilevel undo and the line numbers are a great (...) (23 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: New RcxCC revision posted
|
|
(...) Okay, another round of fixes/modifications. Sorry I'm making these changes so fast. I am *really* interested in hearing from anyone who is trying out my revised RcxCC, by the way. :-) Anyway, this version (available from the link above) (...) (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Wishlist leJOS
|
|
Hi! I'm a leJos newbie, but at a glance, I miss the logging functions that I think NQC has, the ability to store numbers in the RCX for later upload. Is ther a chance that it will be implemented ? At least I would appreciate it Björn Lundin (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Which way is faster?
|
|
By "fastest", I assume you mean the smallest worst case latency between a condition happening and the RCX responding to it. Option #2 has the drawback that while the RCX is responding to one condition, it won't be looking for the other ones. So the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
