 | | RE: RCX Comm via input-output connection?
|
|
Hi Jakob, Search for "Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs" thread on lugnet.robotics.rcx.ncq and various threads on lugnet.robotics ((URL) such as "CM-RCX" and more. I'm finishing up a *NQC* input/output VLL lib that supports direct electrical (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX Comm via input-output connection?
|
|
Hi, Jakob, It is possible and discussed here several times. Have a look at this : (URL) ;-) Why not use the search button ? ;-) (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RCX Comm via input-output connection?
|
|
Hi! Does anyone know if it is possible to have to RCXs communicate by connecting the motor outputs of one to the sensor inputs to the other? I have a slight feeling this could burn things due to the high-voltage (relatively) output of the RCX motor (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Does 9719 include a adapter?
|
|
(...) No it doesn't, but any 12V AC *or* DC adapter will do (polarity is irrelevant). Matthias Jetleb VA3-MWJ (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Revisions to RcxCC
|
|
(...) I am considering taking advantage of the -raw option on NQC or possibly the -remote option to further enable RcxCC in the absence of Spirit.ocx. Of course, most users of RcxCC will have spirit.ocx, but Scout users may not. I'm not planning on (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Exploration Mars Balloon Tires Part#
|
|
Hello Would anyone happen to know the LEGO Shop-At-Home part # for the Balloon Tires that come with the Exploration Mars expanion set ? Thanks Tim Goodwin (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: Does 9719 include a adapter?
|
|
No. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Does 9719 include a adapter?
|
|
I got a new 9719 recently, but there is no adapter, I chcked the inventory of 9719, also no adapter, does 9719 include a adapter? Zhengrong (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
|
(...) from (...) for (...) and (...) Looking further, I note that the newton.meter is the preferred unit for the quantity "moment of force" (also known as torque). (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
|
I did'nt have the piece with me at the time I posted to lugnet, and yes Symbology is important. Increadibly, all of these mechanical aspects can be mapped out and calculated. It's just cool. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
