 | | Re: Assembly in my C-program
|
|
Actually I am trying to control a stepper motor. So when i need to send 50 pulses fast, motor on and off takes same time because there same other tasks running at the same time. So it would be much quicker if I could just call motor speed (50), and (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Dean, thanks for your interesting idea for a reduction of transmission time. I will deal with that as soon as possible. Your questions: (...) Version 2.0 (...) No. Do you think that is faster? (...) No, just the transmission program. (...) Good (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Marco, it is always interesting how many other people in the world do have the same problems or are dealing with the same subject. Sometimes I had the feeling that I dealt with "exotic" problems but then I realized that other "Mindstormers" had (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Assembly in my C-program
|
|
(...) to (...) This should be performed by mapping a variable on top of the memory location, and NOT by inline assembly. (...) What is wrong with speed=0 for off and speed=255 for on? /jakob (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Assembly in my C-program
|
|
HI, I was wondering if I could write assembly code in my c-program. I would like to access the motor output port as a digital port and control when it is on and when off (possibly writting something like "mov.b r6l,@0xf000:16"). Or can I change the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Release date for RCX 2.0?
|
|
Only for RCX! But you can use NQC. Zhengrong (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: .lx format
|
|
(...) We are going to use this solution. Seems simpler. /jakob (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Running IR in the background
|
|
(...) Congratulations! Could you post your source code here, to compare with the solution that we previously submitted to an almost identical question? We use an active light sensor reading in one taks, with a different task bangin zeroes using (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: .lx format
|
|
(...) We arrived at that solution independently here... it makes more sense. Also, since only the parts of the kernel we actually use need to be linked in, the result should be much smaller than a full kernel. Furthermore, the compiler we are using (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: .lx format
|
|
(...) We arrived at that solution independently here... it makes more sense. Also, since only the parts of the kernel we actually use need to be linked in, the result should be much smaller than a full kernel. Furthermore, the compiler we are using (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
