 | | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) We must have the same twisted sense of humor since the necessity of putting it in the FAQ pretty much tipped the scales for me. ObvertOutput() it is! Dave p.s. We'll see if I'm still laughing when people start e-mailing me about it. (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Dumb VB question
|
|
In manual it says that input has to be string, then activeX control parses it and searches for numbers 0,1,2. So perhaps you should define those constants explicitly as strings instead of using variants. "Ben Erwin" <ben@alum.mit.edu> wrote in (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Dumb VB question
|
|
"Ben Erwin" <ben@alum.mit.edu> wrote in message news:FwHKu9.2I1@lugnet.com... (...) how (...) "OUTPUT_AOUTPUT_BOUTPUT_C" (...) This is just a guess, but how about OUTPUT_A + OUTPUT_B + OUTPUT_C . (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) It's a bit obscure, but a perfectly good word -- the opposite of invert. It means to turn something forward, as opposed to invert, which is to turn something backward. (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) I never heard that word before. Jürgen (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
