 | | Re: Syntax for reserving variables in NQC?
|
|
(...) I went with simple... #pragma reserve start [end] where [end] is assumed to be start if not specified. If you want to reserve multiple vars (or multiple ranges) you need to use multiple #pragmas. (...) Yes, its all a bit academic. The only (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: compiler question (second try)
|
|
In article (...) Building under LinuxPPC, I was able to get everything working with egcs 1.1.2. However, gcc 2.95 didn't work. I could get legOS.srec to build and download, it would work OK for turning the RCX on/off, but the first time I tried (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Syntax for reserving variables in NQC?
|
|
(...) How about: #pragma reserve 1 3 5-8 9 with range explicitly specified by "-". Then those that want to specify a range can do so and those who want to specify a list can do so. Of course this assumes that you don't allow arithmetic in the pragma (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 1.0 vs. RIS 1.5 (v. 2.0?)
|
|
(...) 2.0 will work on all 1.0's and 1.5's. No worries. The 2.0 also has the power adapter port back. YA! The software will be legos' new pictorial AND text based that you can transfer back and forth. Very cool stuff. Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 1.0 vs. RIS 1.5 (v. 2.0?)
|
|
For the most part, the differences are in documentation and additional/different pieces, not the RCX hardware itself or the software. The one hardware difference is the lack of an external adapter plug in 1.5 (so, lots more batteries) and I believe (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
