 | | Re: Robolab 2.0
|
|
(...) what do you mean *almost*? :) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Robolab more open
|
|
According to Dr. Chris Rogers at Tufts, Labview 6.0 will have an autowire function, and Robolab 2.5 will be written with Labview 6.0 when it is GA. That is better than what I hoped for. I was proposing was getting instructions on how to modify (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | RCX for sale.
|
|
Hi, Is it allowed to place an advert here in order to sell a box RIS 1.5 or do I have to put it elsewhere? Bert. The Netherlands (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: Making Robolab more open
|
|
That's an interesting idea. I don't have a copy of RoboLab (yet), but I do use LabView 5.1 Some questions: Does RoboLab use the standard firmware? Can you open the RoboLab VI's to get into the sub VI's? Can you install the RoboLab VI's into a (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Making Robolab more open
|
|
The power of software is sometimes greater than what it's creators/programmers envisioned. One way to help create this phenomena is to make the software extensible and extendable by others. Netscape did this by releasing their source code, and the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
