 | | RE: Save image word for pbForth.
|
|
(...) OhOh. Now you have got me thinking again. I can fix my make system to provide images that have optional wordsets, double precision, floats, etc. This is a good thing. (...) Check (URL) and look in the PDA section. LOTS of free stuff there. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Communication with PC using NQC
|
|
(...) Thanks for the explanation. So, it's back to the basics! ;-) I did not explain my question very well, I think. What I would like to do is to steer the RCX from the PC, by querying its state and send it high-level commands (for example to make (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX motor voltage
|
|
(...) encountered an (...) (6 (...) have (...) them (...) did. (...) Yes, using a direct connection to a battery box your motors get more power. I don't know if this idea is applicable to your model, but you could use one motor attached to the RCX (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Save image word for pbForth.
|
|
(...) I like the solution proposed by many Forht packages (by hForth in particular): there is a basic kernel and a few different variations with optional wordsets. For myself, I would like to see at least one additional variation to pbForth - image (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Save image word for pbForth.
|
|
(...) This is an important part of what I want pbForth to be. It should be possible lo load up "precompiled" images to let users put exactly what they want in their system. (...) Since SAVE-SYSTEM is something you do at the END of the development (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
